Mayor wants tough dog law
by Helen McCoy/Douglas County Sentinel Staff Writer
19 months ago | 2273 views | 5 5 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Only a day after the Douglasville City Council failed Monday night to rally enough votes to regulate ownership of pit bulls, a teen in Henry County was killed when she was hit by a car. The 14-year-old girl was allegedly fleeing from an aggressive pit bull as she was walking to her school bus stop.

Mayor Mickey Thompson said the incident could have as easily happened here.

“It is unfortunate,” he said. “But I’m afraid it will continue to happen unless governments and those charged with making the laws have the courage to take action on some of these things.”

A council vote of three in favor and four opposing killed the ordinance which would have allowed people to keep and register pit bulls they already owned, but banned owners from acquiring new pit bulls. People moving into the city would be banned from obtaining or bringing in pit bulls.

Those already in the city would have to be registered with the Douglas County Animal Control, with the owner paying a registration fee and showing proof of $300,000 in liability insurance he would be required to carry to cover bodily injury or damages the dog might cause.

There were also confinement stipulations and a requirement that pit bulls be muzzled in public.

While the ordinance did not pass, Thompson said he would expect similar requirements in a dangerous dog ordinance to which he appointed an ad hoc committee to draft.

Council members LaShun Burr-Danley, Terry Miller and Larry Yockey were appointed to the committee. They, along with Councilman Sam Davis, opposed the pit bull ban.

Speaking to the committee at Monday night’s council meeting, Thompson said that the ordinance must include identification of pure and mixed breed dogs which have statistically been found to cause injury to other animals and people.

Again, he pushed for the registration and insurance components the previous ordinance required and added a training requirement he said the committee could not omit.

“I also want to make it clear that the proposed ordinance must include mandatory registration of such dogs and that their owners must show proof of appropriate insurance and completion of appropriate owner training in order for said dogs to be able to live within the city of Douglasville,” Thompson said.

He vowed to veto any dangerous dog ordinance adopted by the council that didn’t include those provisions.

The committee will report back to the full council on Oct. 28.

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
jhassell
|
October 29, 2010
"(Mayor)Thompson said that the ordinance must include identification of pure and mixed breed dogs which have statistically been found to cause injury to other animals and people."

THANK YOU, some one is finally making sense as numbers dont lie!!!

American Temperament Test Society, Inc.:

Passing Rates by dog breed:

COCKER SPANIEL 81.9% passed

SHIH TZU 78% passed

COLLIE 79.7% passed

CHOW CHOW 71.4% passed

GOLDEN RETRIEVER 84.6% passed

AMERICAN PIT BULL TERRIER 86% passed

AMERICAN STAFFORDSHIRE TERRIER 83.9% passed

BraveheartK9
|
October 08, 2010
James W. I hate to brake your bubble but the statistics have been proven time after time to be wrong. It hasn't even been proven that the dog was a so called pit bull. I'm extremely sorry for the death of this child, but as Anon30134 said how fast was the driver going. Get off the kick of "The Pit Bull did it". And No I do not own a Pit Bull, but I do train, groom and show dogs and I'm sorry but the most aggressive dogs I come across on a daily basis are Shih Tzu and Cockers - Not Pit Bulls. Also for your information the Staffordshire bull Terrier, which is included in these bans, has never been reported in biting a human let alone kick someone, but the fact that he looks like a Pit he is included in the Bans and this is a breed that is called the Nanny Dog!

Diane
Fayclis
|
October 07, 2010
Dear Mayor; WHY do YOU insist that everyone pay for the few?

There are 32 breeds of dogs that are commonly misidentified as "pit bull types". BSL has NOT worked anywhere and has proven to be extremely costly to boot. There is not a single professional organization that agrees with it.

Discrimination and profiling based only on LOOKS is not the way to go. Look to Calgary's animal by-laws. It is the ONLY city in North America where dog bites and attacks have steadily decreased and it's law are FAIR and Just to ALL citizens. Calgary makes individual owners accountable with severe penalties and animal control pays for itself and is NOT a drain on city taxpayers.

Seems like SOME have actually done their homework and YOU should also. Witch Hunts are NOT the way to go.

James W.
|
October 07, 2010
Don't give up Mr. Mayor. We need to ban all Pit Bulls from Douglasville. They are a vicious breed. The statistics prove it!!!
Anon30134
|
October 07, 2010
I'm saddened to hear that a child was killed in an incident like this I'm truly sorry for her families loss. Especially when this could have been avoided had the dogs owner had a leash on the dog or a fenced in yard. I say dog because any large breed dog is capable of chasing someone and causing serious harm. They're still animals and one breed isn't nessecarily any safer than another when unsupervised. A glock is no safer than a berretta or a magnum if handled incorrectly or irresponsibly. When they say she was walking to her bus stop I assume this was a residential area where the speed limit is usually 25 mph. How fast was the driver going I understand being hit at 25 mph can still kill someone depending on where they're hit but the odds of them surviving would be a lot better at 25 versus 55. Assuming it was a residential area and the driver was traveling at the posted speed limit what else were they doing? Were they paying attention to the road or were they talking on the phone or texting. I understand it may be legal to talk and drive at the same time but it's still distracting non the less and there happens to be a law against driving while distracted. I also understand that a child running out from the middle of nowhere to avoid being mauled is not what you would look out for while you're driving. However in a residential area you're usually more prone to watch out for kids chasing after a ball that went into the street and if you're distracted because you're talking, texting checking your facebook status you won't be able to react in time. Again I'm sorry for her families loss buy why does it always have to be the pit bull's fault? Why does the media always have to paint them in a bad light? If they're going to say allegedly why even say pit bull why not just say it was a dog? There are over 20 different breeds of dogs that commonly misidentified as a pit bull not to mention that a pit bull isn't even a breed it's a generic term used to describe three different breeds.
.